Every client's SEO data, in the AI you already use.

The work that makes an agency money is analysis and decisions: which client is slipping, which page is worth updating, what to tell them on the call. The work that fills the day is everything around it: logging into one client's Search Console, setting the date range, hitting the 1,000-row export cap, opening their GA4, cross-referencing by hand, then doing it all again for the next client.

That overhead scales with your roster. Each client is at least two Google logins, Search Console and GA4, behind separate interfaces with their own export limits. An agency running 30 clients is maintaining 60 separate data views before a single recommendation gets made. The monthly reporting cycle alone can eat days that bill for nothing.

Most tools answer this with a heavier platform: more dashboards, more tabs, seats and roles and a procurement process. That adds surface area, not speed. The analysis still happens in your head, and now there is more software to drive to get to it.

That SEO Agent takes the opposite path. It connects every client site to the AI you already work in, and the AI does the fetching and cross-referencing. You ask the question in plain language; it pulls the live data for that client and answers. The overhead collapses; the analysis is still yours.

There is no white-label mode, no client logins, no seats, no roles, and no SSO. That is deliberate. Those features serve the buying process and the org chart, not the person actually analyzing a site and deciding what to fix.

What you get instead is the work surface: every client's live data in your AI, audits on demand, shareable report links you can send to a client, and tasks that track the fixes. Reports are shareable URLs, not a branded portal you have to administer.

This makes the tool a poor fit for an agency that needs a multi-seat platform with permission matrices and compliance audit trails. It makes it an excellent fit for the practitioner, solo or in a small team, who is responsible for client outcomes and wants the overhead gone.

If you grow past 100 sites, the Scale tier handles 100-plus. The model does not change: priced by the sites you run, never by the number of people or the features you are allowed to touch.